Leechburg may put sanitary sewer lines under sidewalks
Leechburg officials are looking to spare borough streets from damage in an upcoming sewage separation project.
To do that, council is talking about having new sanitary sewer lines installed under sidewalks.
Preliminary work on a project to separate the remainder of Leechburg's combined sewage system is ongoing. Work to date has included mapping, inspections and survey work of the existing system and other utility lines.
The borough will apply for permits for the work by the end of the year, and in spring 2014 begin seeking money to pay for it, said Ben Bothell of Senate Engineering.
The system serving about 40 percent of the borough has already been separated.
Council President Tony Defilippi said some of the borough's streets are already in bad shape, and the sewage project would only make them worse.
Likewise, there are streets in good condition that the borough does not want to tear up, Bothell said.
A problem with putting the sanitary lines under sidewalks would be that it would require removing a lot of trees, said Jay Quade, a senior inspector with Senate Engineering. Utility poles could also be an issue.
Quade said sewage lines could not be placed under sidewalks in all areas, and there would still be places where lines would have to cut across streets.
“We would have to look at each block independently,” Quade said. “There are a number where we could do it without much trouble.”
Replacing sidewalks would likely by covered by the project, he said.
Mayor Tony Roppolo said he would want to see good specifications for replacing sidewalks to be sure it's done right. Fixes to sidewalks during the prior project were “deplorable,” he said.
“I think a bunch of fourth-graders could've done a better job,” he said. “We learned good lessons the first time around what not to do.”
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Former drug dealer, addict give away groceries as part of church’s outreach
- Project SEED expands
- Scout’s kiosk to tell brave woman’s tale
- Electricity rates expected to increase this winter
- Beaver footprints found along Allegheny River bank, not gator
- Plum woman dies in Washington Township crash
- Blaze destroys Oakmont church
- Avonmore’s Harvest Jubilee turns 50
- Fire ravages 2 buildings in downtown New Kensington
- Scouts prepare goodie bags as show of support for A-K Valley police
- Harmar to allow electrified security fencing