More charges filed in Route 28 chase
Prosecutors on Wednesday added new charges against a Pittsburgh man accused of leading state police on a high-speed chase through several Alle-Kiski Valley communities late last month.
Todd A. Brown Sr., 45, of the Lincoln-Lemington section of Pittsburgh, waived his right to a preliminary hearing Wednesday.
The new charges include 20 counts of reckless driving and 10 counts of recklessly endangering another person.
Brown is accused of fleeing from a DUI check point on Route 28 at the Creighton-Russellton exit (Exit 13) in East Deer on June 28.
Instead of stopping, police said, Brown backed up on the shoulder of the off-ramp and fled from police, traveling north on Route 28.
He exited at Tarentum, sped around the borough, crossed the bridge, then traveled through New Kensington and Arnold.
He eventually ended up in Plum, where a state police trooper was able to strategically disable Brown's vehicle on Kerr Road near Logans Ferry Road.
Officers clocked him traveling 90 mph on Freeport Road in New Kensington, where the speed limit is 25 mph, and 100 mph on Constitution Boulevard. Police said that at one point, Brown was driving 105 mph in a Windstar minivan.
Brown also allegedly tried to ram a state police car that tried to block his path in Arnold.
Police later found that Brown was driving on a license that had been suspended as a result of a drunken-driving conviction.
Brown also faces charges of fleeing from police, aggravated assault, driving with a suspended license and multiple traffic violations.
District Judge Carolyn Bengel agreed to Brown's attorney's request to change Brown's $50,000 bail from straight cash to unsecured. He was being held in the Allegheny County Jail.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.