Police remain mum on deadly wreck in Monroeville
Further details about the accident that killed a Parks Township woman and her son Thursday remain unavailable.
Police still have not released the name of the 65-year-old man whom they say crashed his pickup truck into two cars along the Golden Mile Highway section of Route 286 in Monroeville.
The second car he hit was carrying Jennifer Sample, 28, and her son, Daniel Eck, 7, who were killed in the collision.
Police said Sample's husband, Cody Sample, who was driving their vehicle, suffered serious injuries, but the hospital where he is being treated has not been named. A fourth occupant of the Samples' vehicle, 15-month-old Ben Sample, escaped serious injury, police said.
The 65-year-old pickup driver also was injured and taken to a hospital. The lone occupant of the first vehicle struck by the truck when it veered into the northbound lane was not injured, police said.
Calls from the Valley News Dispatch to a spokesman for the Allegheny County police, who are handling the crash investigation, were not returned Saturday.
Meanwhile, the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's office released the results of an autopsy conducted Saturday on Jennifer Sample. It determined that she died of blunt force trauma to the head and chest. Her death was ruled accidental
Investigators, to this point, said they do not believe drugs or alcohol played a role in the collision but must wait for toxicology testing to be completed before a final determination is made.
They also are investigating if the driver of the pickup truck was suffering a medical event at the time of the collision.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.