Preliminary hearing delayed for Saxonburg man accused in burning of 7-year-old boy
The Butler County District Attorney's Office has requested time to interview a “third party” witness in the case against a Saxonburg man accused in a series of assaults on his girlfriend's son.
District Judge Lewis Stoughton granted the prosecution's request to reschedule Tuesday's preliminary hearing for Edward Myers, 36.
Myers' attorney, Gerald Cassady, said he believes the witness is a juvenile who was in Myers' Carol Drive home on May 25 when Myers is accused of intentionally injuring the 7-year-old boy and then not getting him medical attention.
“We are hopeful that this will provide information that is valuable for his defense,” Cassady said.
Myers is accused of pouring flammable nail polish remover on the boy and watching as a juvenile in the house set the liquid aflame.
The boy suffered third-degree burns on his chest, neck and face. He spent several weeks at UPMC Mercy in Pittsburgh.
Myers is also accused of shooting the child with an AirSoft BB rifle, causing multiple bruises. According to police, two boys, ages 11 and 15, participated.
The incidents occurred when Myers' girlfriend left her son in Myers' care for about seven hours.
Myers allegedly filmed the attacks with a cellphone. Cassady said Tuesday he hasn't had an opportunity to review video evidence.
Myers is charged with aggravated assault, related charges and two drug offenses. He is being held in the Butler County jail on $250,000 bond.
His preliminary hearing was rescheduled for Aug. 13.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.