Fire destroys vacant mobile home in Gilpin
Firefighters from Gilpin and Leechburg volunteer fire departments battle a fire at a recently vacated mobile home along Evergreen Road in Gilpin on Tuesday, July 30, 2013.
Photo by Erica Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Gilpin police Chief Dan Clark said it was fortunate the residents of a mobile home that was gutted by flames Tuesday evening had moved out a few days ago.
“The whole house had flames shooting out of it” when Clark arrived at 741 Evergreen Road about 5:30 p.m. Tuesday.
Several neighbors reported the fire, which spread quickly through the mobile home that sits atop a block foundation with a one-car garage, Clark said. The house is near Wildlife Lane, just down a hillside from Route 66.
No one was injured, Clark said, and fire crews had no difficulty extinguishing the fast-moving blaze that left the roof partially collapsed, white siding singed and char marks climbing the walls from the front windows.
The police chief spoke in lieu of fire Chief Phillip McConville, whom Clark said did not want to comment.
A family that had rented the house moved out just a few days before, Clark and homeowner Patty Fouse said. The tenants left on good terms, both said.
There is no reason to suspect the cause of the fire is suspicious, Clark said.
However, Clark said, there was so much flame when he arrived that it was difficult to pinpoint where the fire began. A state police fire marshal is expected to investigate the cause Wednesday afternoon.
Patty Fouse said she and her husband, Russell, lived in the trailer when they bought it about 40 years ago.
They moved when they built their current house nearby, she said. A daughter had lived in the trailer before they rented it out.
“It's been in the family a long time,” she said.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.