Vandergrift seeks financing to keep treatment plants clear of storm water
Vandergrift Council on Monday took another big step on the road to the borough's sewer separation project.
The council, with Vern Sciullo absent, unanimously approved an ordinance that allows it to seek approval from the Pennsylvania Infrastructure and Investment Authority (PennVEST) for financing the $10 million project.
Once completed, the project will put the borough in compliance with a federal mandate to separate the combined sanitary and storm sewers. The Environmental Protection Agency and the state's Department of Environmental Protection are pushing municipalities to comply to reduce excessive flow carrying storm water and sewage to the sewage treatment plants. That often results in the plants being overwhelmed by the flow, which is bypassed into streams and rivers.
It means council will have the money it needs to pay for the project in the form of a $2.6 million grant and an $8.2 million low interest loan.
The loan will be for a 30-year term at a 1 percent interest rate.
When PennVEST first offered the funding package in April, borough officials hesitated to accept it. They had hoped the funding components would be reversed with the bulk of the package coming in a grant — money that does not have to be repaid — and the rest in a loan.
Borough officials initially miscalculated that customer bills could more than double to pay off the 30-year, low-interest loan, which caused them to balk at the PennVEST offer.Borough Manager Steve DelleDonne said with council's action on Monday, bid proposals for the project will be advertised in September, likely awarded in October with the project starting in December or January.
Tom Yerace is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4675 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.