ATV rider killed in North Buffalo
A West Franklin Township man was killed in an ATV accident Saturday in North Buffalo Township, Armstrong County.
The Armstrong County Coroner's Office identified the man as Jason David Toy, 39, of Claypoole Road. He was pronounced dead at the scene by Deputy Coroner Brian K. Myers.
State police Trooper Eric Maurer said Toy and another man were riding on separate quads around 5:40 p.m. when Toy lost control and veered off of Church Road and apparently struck a tree.
Maurer said alcohol is believed to have been a factor in the crash. Neither man was wearing a helmet, police said.
The other man, identified by state police as Sidney Ford, 47, of Cadogan, was arrested at the scene. He appeared to be highly intoxicated, said state police Cpl. Chris Robbins.
State police said Ford will be charged with DUI and illegally operating an ATV on a state road. Ford was not injured.
The accident occurred on a slight bend near a line of trees next to the MDS Energy site north of Route 28. The men were headed toward Cadogan Slate Lick Road when the accident occurred.
An autopsy will not be performed. The cause of death was ruled blunt force trauma to the head and chest. The manner of death is accidental, Myers said.
Police said Ford told them that Toy was riding ahead of him and got out of sight. He said he rounded the bend and saw Toy laying near the side of the road.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.