Deer Lakes delays decision on ending class rankings
The Deer Lakes School Board is exploring the possibility of eliminating ranking class members starting with the 2014-15 freshman class, but no decision is expected soon.
Education Committee Chairwoman Rebekah Stankowski said about half of local school districts have eliminated it and colleges don't ask for class rank these days.
Several board members said class rankings discourage some students from taking more difficult classes in order to not imperil a high class ranking.
“It hurts our students more than it helps our students,” Merlo said.
“I still like the rank system,” board member William LuPone said.
Several parents spoke in favor of retaining the rankings system at the board's meeting on Tuesday night.
Parent Barbara Bick said her daughters didn't participate in sports and “academics is their competition, it's their lettermen's jackets, it's a way of being recognized.”
High school Principal Joseph Orr is looking at a way to formulate students' admission to the National Honor Society should class ranks be eliminated.
Board members said they weren't prepared to make a decision. They canceled a vote on the issue that was set for Monday.
Residents were urged to look for more public educational committee meetings where the matter will be further discussed.
Policy Committee Chairwoman Jodi Banyas-Galecki reminded residents that her committee will meet at 1 p.m. on Aug. 29 in the district's central office to discuss general behavior and punishment.
Parents and others can offer input on severity or leniency for punishments starting with the 2014-15 school year.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.