3 local residents charged with various drug offenses
Three area residents face an assortment of drug charges after police say they found the trio with 77 stamp bags of heroin and more than $1,200 in cash at the Valley Motel in Harmar.
Charges including possession with intent to deliver, criminal conspiracy, and corrupt organizations have been filed against Sean Steven Weist, 30, and Charles Ware, 26, both of Bakerstown Road, Tarentum.
Charges against Tabitha Marie Thomas, 23, of Church Street, West Deer, include possession, possession with intent to deliver and delivery.
A preliminary hearing for all three suspects will be continued until next Monday before District Judge David Sosovicka in Harmar.
After receiving complaints about constant traffic at 1309 Bakerstown Road, Tarentum police launched an investigation, Sgt. James Newcomer of the Tarentum police said.
According to the complaint, police observed alleged drug sales at the Bakerstown Road home and in a room at the Valley Motel along Freeport Road in Harmar.
Weist and Ware were using both places to sell drugs, police said.
On Aug. 8, Tarentum police and members of the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Municipal Drug Task Force got a search warrant for Room 2 at the Valley Motel. They found 77 stamp bags of heroin, a filter for crack pipes, two glass crack pipes, a cooking spoon, wrapping commonly used to wrap bricks of heroin and other items.
On Aug. 9, police got a search warrant for 1309 Bakerstown Road and found 3 stamp bags of suspected heroin, hypodermic needles, a stun gun and several unidentified pills.
Weist, Ware and Thomas are in the Allegheny County jail in lieu of $75,000 bond each.
Mary Ann Thomas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4691 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.