Sex offender arrested in Harrison for failing to register
U.S. marshals and Harrison Township police arrested a convicted sex offender over the weekend who allegedly failed to alert authorities of his recent address in the Natrona section of Harrison.
Martin Girdler, 56, of 1 Walnut St., Boathouse Bar and Hotel, is in the Allegheny County Jail on straight bond of $5,000, according to a jail spokesman.
Girdler was taken from his Walnut Street address without incident by U.S. marshals and township police, according to Mike Klein, Harrison police chief.
According to the state's so-called Megan's Law, after completing prison terms, people convicted of child luring, sexual child abuse and about 18 other categories must report their addresses, job status and other data to state police annually for 15 years.
The law is named for a 7-year-old New Jersey girl who was molested and killed in 1994 by a neighbor who had been convicted of sex crimes against children.
Girdler's sex offender status is based on a 2002 conviction of possession of child pornography in Colorado, according to Klein.
According to a patchwork of records in several states, Girdler lived in Madisonville, Ky., until June 28, according to Sgt. Rick Saint-Blancard of the Kentucky State Police.
“He was compliant when he left here,” Saint-Blancard said.
Mary Ann Thomas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4691 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.