Freeport considers connecting with Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority
Anticipating millions of dollars worth of improvements will eventually be needed at its own sewage treatment facility, Freeport Borough officials are looking to tie into the Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority system.
“We want alternatives,” said borough council President Don Rehner. “If the cost is beneficial to residents we could tap into their system.”
In about five years, the borough could be required to finance between $12 million and $14 million in upgrades to its sewage treatment facility.
The upgrades would ensure the plant complies with new environmental regulations.
The borough is providing flow information to the Upper Allegheny Joint authority in order to find out if connecting to the system is feasible.
“We are in very preliminary discussions,” Rehner said.
No one from the authority could be reached for comment.
The Upper Allegheny Joint Sanitary Authority serves Brackenridge, Buffalo Township, East Deer, Fawn, Harrison and Tarentum.
In other business
Work is progressing on the new heating and cooling system in the borough building and police station.
Duct work is being installed and the new boiler system and air conditioning units will be installed soon, officials said.
“It's going to be a tremendous cost savings for us,” said Rehner.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.