PennDOT offers options on Route 366 bridge construction
The bridge on Route 366 that crosses Route 56 at the cloverleaf near Memorial Park in New Kensington will be replaced in 2014,. Photographed on Thursday, Aug. 29, 2013.
Photo by Eric Felack | Valley News Dispatch
PennDOT is moving forward with plans to replace the structurally deficient Route 366 bridge over Route 56 in New Kensington.
A public meeting to display plans for the project is set for 3 p.m., Sept. 3 at New Kensington City Hall.
“The plans will show some alternatives in different ways of construction,” said PennDOT spokeswoman Valerie Petersen. “They look for public input on the plan they created.”
The project is estimated to cost about $4.7 million, although contract bids have not been sought.
Construction would not begin until next year, Petersen said.
Work will be done on one side of the bridge at a time in order to maintain one-lane, two-way traffic on the bridge, Petersen said. There could be short-term detours.
About 15,000 vehicles travel that portion of Route 366 on an average day.
The 56-year-old span is on PennDOT's list of structurally deficient bridges. Its rating of 70.3 out of 100 makes it eligible for funding.
New Kensington City Clerk Dennis Scarpiniti said the project will benefit the city.
“We're looking forward to it,” he said. “We only have two local bridges — the viaduct and Ninth Street — and they're relatively new. And now we're going to have this new infrastructure.
“I think it's great for the City of New Kensington.”
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.