Winfield OKs contract for catch basins
Winfield Township officials hope to solve a problem soon involving faulty catch basins on Marwood Hill.
Supervisors on Thursday night awarded a nearly $18,500 contract to Holbein, Inc. to install three catch basins on Marwood.
During rainstorms, stones and other debris clog the three drains and stormwater cascades down a hill toward residences, which have reported flooding, officials said.
Holbein plans to form an asphalt wedge, shaped like a bowl, around the new catch basins, with a 3-inch base.
Holbein said it could have the job done within 30 days.
The money for the project will be taken from the township's liquid fuels reimbursement fund.
The township's public works crew will install catch basins on Keasey Road, along with cross drains and pavement patching.
Other roads set for sealcoating this fall include Stoney Hollow, Jones, Casham, Gerner and Spiker Hill.
Fire hall to fix sewage backup
The township's fire hall, located next to the township building, experienced a sewage backup over the weekend.
One event for this weekend has been cancelled, and restoration workers are replacing toilets, some drywall and other items. A portable toilet will be rented for upcoming events until the fire hall is restored.
Sewerage pumps might need to be replaced at a cost estimated to be between $500 and $700.
The township and the fire department share the sewerage system.
George Guido is a freelance writerfor Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.