Share This Page

Longtime Highlands school worker dies from fall injuries

| Friday, Aug. 30, 2013, 1:41 a.m.
Robert E. Rose Jr., 64, of Tarentum, passed away unexpectedly Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013, at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh.

A Highlands School District employee has died from head injuries suffered while working at the administration building last week.

Robert E. “Rosey” Rose, 64, of Tarentum, a Highlands van driver and supply clerk for 36 years, died Wednesday night at Allegheny General Hospital, according to the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's office.

One Thursday, the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's Office said Rose suffered head injuries when he fell off a ramp at the former administration building shortly before 10 a.m. on Aug. 21.

On Friday, the ME's office revised that, saying that Rose had fallen through a ramp, not off of one.

He died from blunt force trauma to the head; his death was ruled accidental.

The medical examiner said Harrison police were investigating; however, the department could not be reached for comment.

A school district spokeswoman said Solicitor Ira Weiss is working with authorities to determine what happened.

“Through his years at Highlands, ‘Rosey' became a district staple,” said Misty Chybrzynski, Highlands spokeswoman.

“He truly enjoyed helping people. He will be very much missed, and Highlands sends its deepest condolences to Mr. Rose's family.”

Rose was an Air Force veteran who served in Vietnam.

His obituary can be found here.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.