ShareThis Page

Bidding to start on 2nd phase of Vandergrift sewer project

| Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2013, 12:26 a.m.

Vandergrift officials hope to start the $10 million Phase II of the stormwater/sewerage separation project in January.

Council on Monday night approved the bidding process that will lead to the start of the largest of the three-phase project, mandated by a federal order for a number of municipalities that had commingled storm and sewer pipes, some dating from a century ago.

Phase II will involve more than 1,000 households in the borough.

Prospective bidders will meet with officials on Sept. 24 to receive background information on Phase II, which will be divided into two projects. A company could bid on one or both of the projects.

Council will open the bids on Oct. 11 at 10 a.m.

If one company gets both contracts, it would presumably need to hire two crews. There will be an 18-month window to complete the project.

Michael Bove of Bove Engineering said he hopes both portions of Phase II will be done during the summer of 2015, since it's best to avoid doing restoration work during the winter.

The financing of the $10 million overall project includes a $2.6 million state grant and an $8.2 million, 30-year low-interest loan.

Bove said last Wednesday's serious thunderstorm provided the nearly-completed Phase I with a test of how stormwater is handled with separated pipes.

Only a few households reportedly had backups.

Officials said three inches of rain fell in 45 minutes.

A lingering Phase I problem involves homeowners who have yet to detach their downspouts from the main stormwater system. About 30 homes have yet to comply.

Those not in compliance will be sent a citation letter, warning that a fine of $300 per day will be assessed.

Residents at Tuesday's meeting complained that some detached downspouts are pointed toward neighbors' homes.

Solicitor Larry Loperfito will research the borough's code for a possible ordinance that prohibits pointing a downspout toward a neighbor.

Hearing set

Council slated a public hearing for Oct. 7 at 6:30 p.m. to determine if a paper alley near California and Oregon avenues in Upper West Vandergrift will be eliminated.

Interested parties are welcome to testify.

In other business

• Lutterman Excavating of Greensburg was awarded a $6,200 contract to demolish a dilapidated home at 912 Wallace Street.

• Councilman Lenny Collini said he is fed up with vandalism at the borough's park and pool. Vandals recently broke into a shed and painted playground equipment. Council will look into a possible video system for the area.

• Council thanked officer Pete King, who retired after 23 years on the borough's police force. Part-timers will be used until a new full-time officer is hired.

• Vandergrift's share of service costs to the Westmore-land County Transit Authority for bus service will increase to $1,030 next year, up from $982 this year.

George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.