Police say Saxonburg man grew marijuana in his yard
Saxonburg police on Tuesday accused a borough man of growing marijuana at his High Street home.
Patrolman Kevin Stiles wrote in a criminal complaint that someone visiting the neighborhood on Saturday noticed two 3-foot, potted marijuana plants growing in the yard at 355 High St.
The homeowner, Frank Douglas Christy, 51, was forthcoming about the plants on his property: “Yep, it is what you think it is,” Christy told police, according to Stiles.
In addition to the plants, police also seized four sandwich bags of marijuana, 10 prescription bottles with missing or handwritten labels, several pipes, the butts of alleged marijuana cigarettes (called roaches) and other alleged drug paraphernalia found in the home's living room and bedrooms, according to a press release from police Chief Joseph Beachem.
Police also seized a shotgun and pellet gun, Beachem said.
Christy was charged with one count each of drug possession and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was arraigned on Tuesday before Chicora District Judge Lewis E. Stoughton and released.
Christy tentatively faces a preliminary hearing before Stoughton on Tuesday.
Police said Christy was very cooperative and insisted his wife, who was not charged, was not involved in growing or using the marijuana.
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.