New Ken man sentenced in 2012 break-in
A New Kensington man recently was sentenced to 17 to 40 years in jail for a 2012 violent home invasion.
Ian Timothy Johnson, 23, pleaded guilty to burglary, three counts of robbery with threat of immediate serious injury, two counts of aggravated assault, one count of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse by threat of forcible compulsion, and a count of illegally possessing a firearm.
According to court documents, in January 2012 Johnson and two other men, Terry Houston and Akeem Francher, broke into a house on the 300 block of McCargo Street.
The trio beat two men who were in the house and demanded money. A woman who was at the house testified that Johnson put a gun to her head and sexually assaulted her.
The woman said the men pistol-whipped her two friends, who were watching movies at the house at the time of the invasion.
She testified that Johnson, Houston and Francher broke bottles over the victims' heads and forced them to punch each other for their amusement.
In her testimony, the woman said, the men repeatedly said they were looking for money “the knew was there.”
When they only found $5, they became angry and violent.
Houston, 30, was sentenced to 5 to 10 years in jail for his role in the burglary. Francher, 23, was sentenced to 4 to 10 years in jail for his involvement.
Westmoreland County Judge John E. Blahovec mandated that Johnson register as a violent sexual predator for the rest of his life upon his release from jail.
R.A. Monti is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.