Freeport Area takes steps to bolster security
The Freeport Area School District is moving ahead with plans to enhance security measures within its schools.
In the wake of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut last year, the district has consulted with state police and held teacher and staff safety training sessions.
Most recently, the district had state police conduct a risk and vulnerability assessment at the junior high school. Officials plan to incorporate suggestions into the design of the new junior high school.
The administration wants to have similar evaluations done on the other district buildings.
“The wait is 18 months; before Connecticut, it was a year,” Superintendent Chris DeVivo said.
Board member Mark Shoaf requested that the administration look into funding options to reconfigure the high school's main entrance.
He suggested a new entrance that would have visitors enter directly into the office, rather than the current design in which visitors are buzzed into the building and then walk down a hallway to the office.
In other business
• The board approved switching to Pond Security Service to provide security at district athletic events. Guards will be paid $14 per hour.
• The board hired W.L. Roenigk to demolish two houses on South Pike Road (Route 356) in front of the high school at a cost of about $16,000.
• The board approved a $6,900 contract with Ron Gillette, Inc. to remove trees in that same area.
• The board accepted an $8,059 donation from the Buffalo Elementary School Playground Fund to buy a school sign with an electronic message board for Buffalo Elementary.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.