ShareThis Page

Springdale family gets water back while deal negotiated in 'smart meter' case

| Thursday, Sept. 12, 2013, 12:41 a.m.
Cindee Zlacki, right, and her neighbor, Connie Flick, stand outside Zlacki's house on Railroad Street in Springdale, where her water has been turned off because of her refusal to get a smart meter installed inside the home. She is worried that possible radiation from the meter will affect her two children with epilepsy.
Eric Felack | Valley News Dispatch
Cindee Zlacki, right, and her neighbor, Connie Flick, stand outside Zlacki's house on Railroad Street in Springdale, where her water has been turned off because of her refusal to get a smart meter installed inside the home. She is worried that possible radiation from the meter will affect her two children with epilepsy.

For the first time since Aug. 30, Cindee Zlacki of Springdale and her seven kids could shower at their own house on Tuesday.

An Allegheny County Court judge has ordered the borough to restore water to the family's Railroad Street residence while the Zlackis and borough officials work toward a resolution over Springdale's mandated “smart meter” system.

The borough began installing digital readers two years ago in its 1,750 residences in place of traditional water meters.

The smart meters submit monthly consumption data to a centralized system via radio frequencies.

The meters record in minutes what used to take days and save Springdale taxpayers thousands of dollars in labor costs each year, according to John Molnar, borough street and water chairman.

Yet some residents, like Zlacki, ignored the mandated installation, fearing that the radio frequency emissions pose potential health risks.

With two epileptic sons and a husband with emphysema, Zlacki was among the six Springdale residents who on Aug. 30 had their water shut off for refusing to comply with the borough's system.

John Zagari, the Springdale woman's Pittsburgh-based attorney, successfully filed an injunction in county court on Tuesday to have the family's water restored.

He claims that the borough is violating her right of due process.

“If you want to act as a monopolistic power in this country, you need to provide your citizens with viable alternatives,” he said. “I'm not saying you can't implement a cost-saving program, but to force it upon everyone without exception is unconstitutional.”

On Tuesday, Allegheny County Judge Alan Hertzberg gave Zagari and Springdale Solicitor Steve Yakopec until Sept. 18 to resolve Zlacki's situation or it will go to trial.

Zagari hopes an agreement can be reached, but Yakopec expresses doubt.

“I don't know how this is going to be resolved,” Yakopec said. “If I knew of a solution beyond (Zlacki) complying, it would be done already.”

Zagari said his client would be content with paying a monthly surcharge to retain the traditional water meters and have borough workers check the numbers at her meter.

Molnar said that option is off the table, fearing that her exemption would set precedent for anyone to have their smart meters removed.

“It's a difficult situation,” he said. “I understand where she's coming from, but we don't want to give anyone preferential treatment.

“I wish she would look at the research and realize there are no real health concerns.”

The smart meters and recording technology used by the borough are products of Sensus, which calls itself a global utility infrastructure systems company.

With the typical meter transmitting less than one second per day, the Sensus products comply with Federal Communications Commission and Environmental Protection Agency safety regulations.

The California Council on Science and Technology concluded in 2010 that “the FCC standard provides a currently accepted factor of safety against known thermally induced health impacts of smart meters and other electronic devices in the same range of (radio frequency) emissions.

“Exposure levels from smart meters are well below the thresholds for such effects.”

The council compared smart meter radio frequency emissions to those of baby monitors, televisions and microwave ovens.

But a 2009 report from the New York-based Institute for Health and the Environment concluded that the health risks associated with wireless technologies like smart meters are widely unknown and could be more damaging than some studies indicate.

The report goes on to state that the unchecked and expanding development of wireless technologies like smart meters could lead to an epidemic of potentially fatal afflictions, including some brain cancers.

Zlacki said she is most concerned about the potential effects the smart meters' radio frequency emissions will have on her two epileptic sons. She fears the emissions will cause muscle spasms and subsequent seizures, particularly with one who spent 153 days in Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh last year because of a series of seizures.

Should the situation go to trial, Zagari is confident the court will rule in his client's favor. He says judges in five other states have ruled against the municipality in similar cases.

“It's a common sense thing,” he said. “Simple as that. The borough thinks they can do whatever they want, and they're wrong.”

Springdale Council President David Finley might take exception.

“Yeah, let's all stop everything because someone on Railroad Street doesn't want smart meters,” he said. “Let's make medical exceptions for everyone and remove the whole system at an expense of $14,000 of taxpayer money.”

Braden Ashe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4673 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.