Avonmore man who videotaped himself raping girl sentenced to 21 years
An Avonmore man has been sentenced in federal court to 21 years in prison for his guilty plea on charges of producing child pornography.
Timothy Eugene Shearer, 54, was ordered to serve a lifetime of supervision upon his release from prison.
State police arrested Shearer one year ago Thursday on charges that he engaged in sexual activity with a young girl and boy and taped the incidents.
According to information presented in federal court, from February through September 2009 and in or around October 2006, Shearer engaged in sexual conduct with a minor for the purpose of taking photos and videos. He was indicted also for possession of child pornography.
According to court documents, Shearer video recorded himself having sex with a then-8-year-old girl.
At his sentencing hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Lieber Smolar said the girl told police that Shearer had begun sexually assaulting her when she was about 5 or 6.
Shearer denied abusing the girl until family members found a hidden video camera containing a tape with a recording of one of the sexual assaults.
After the discovery, he admitted to having sexual contact with the girl and taking sexually explicit photos of her.
Shearer was convicted on state charges stemming from the rape of the girl and a then- 4-year-old boy.
His state sentence will run concurrent with his federal sentence.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.