Harrison mill harnesses new tech to cut down on pollution
In 2006, ATI-Allegheny Ludlum was forced to pay a fine of nearly $300,000 as part of a settlement the company reached with the Allegheny County Health Department.
The Health Department echoed decades-long claims that the mill was polluting the air around Harrison, Tarentum, and Brackenridge, and fined it for nitrogen oxide and sulfur oxide emission violations.
That more than likely won't be the case when the new Allegheny Technologies Inc. opens a hot strip mill at its Brackenridge Works in Harrison.
The $1.1 billion mill will be state-of-the-art in every aspect, when it opens in December, including pollution control.
The mill has come under heavy scrutiny over the last three decades for air pollution. In 2008, a USA Today survey concluded the air around Highlands High School as the 110th most polluted in the country.
The mill's new technology, which will allow it to phase out old, dirty, production methods, will cut down on air pollution, mill officials say.
Although it will be better, the new mill won't be totally clean.
A study done by the Allegheny County Health Department showed nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide output will increase at the new mill.
That's something Allegheny Ludlum will have to buy “pollution credits” because of. That means Allegheny Ludlum can buy certain amounts of pollution usage from other companies that have not used theirs.
The plant will continuously re-use water taken from the Allegheny River, thereby reducing what the plant needs to take from the river.
Less than 5 percent of the water used will be returned to the river, and that water will be cleaner than when it came in, company officials said.
R.A. Monti is a freelance reporter for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.