Bad rap: Woman chaperoning Springdale High dance accused of assaulting female student over music
A Springdale Junior-Senior High School dance chaperone is charged for allegedly grabbing a 16-year-old girl's arm in a dispute about rap music.
Dana Kris Schreckengost, 40, of Philomena Circle in Harmar is accused of simple assault and a summary count of harassment for an Oct. 5 incident at the Allegheny Valley Fire Hall in Springdale Township.
The township police affidavit filed in the case accuses Schreckengost of “accosting” a teenage girl “for playing too much rap music at the dance.”
Police allege the girl ran into the bathroom to get away, but the woman followed “pointing her finger in her face and swearing at her.”
Schreckengost is accused of grabbing the teen by her arm and continuing to scream at her.
The girl went into a bathroom stall, where Schreckengost demanded she open the stall door and told her to quit crying, police said.According to the affidavit, police weren't notified of the incident by Springdale High School officials and learned about it when the girl and her mother went to the police station on Oct. 9. The charges were filed two days later in the office of District Judge David J. Sosovicka.
A clerk said the charges would be mailed to Schreckengost. A preliminary hearing will be scheduled.
The high school is part of the Allegheny Valley School District.
A letter sent to district parents said the district is continuing its investigation and “will process all information” to “determine appropriate action.”
The district is continuing to “review practices for parent-sponsored and school sponsored events.”
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.