West Deer man torched neighbor's surveillance camera, police say
A 41-year-old West Deer man is accused of telling police he used a torch to burn his neighbor's surveillance camera and part of a garage.
Frank Robert Thompson, of Superior Road, is charged with arson-endangering property and two related charges.West Deer police said the neighbor was not at home and didn't know anything about the damage until police told the neighbor.
Police Chief Jon Lape said officers on patrol got a telephone call from 911 about 10:30 a.m. on Oct. 12 telling them a man was waiting at their station to surrender.
In an affidavit, Thompson told arriving officers that “he had committed arson last night and really needed to go to the Allegheny County Jail.”
Police said the fire was set about 12 hours earlier.
According to the affidavit, Thompson said he set the fire “for the criminal thrill” and he “had nothing against” the owners of the house.Police said Thompson wrote a statement of what happened and asked an officer if what he did was “severe enough” to take him to jail.A victim told police the family was frightened and had never done anything to Thompson.
The victim said it would cost about $1,000 to replace the camera and repair the garage.
In addition to arson, Thompson is charged with causing or risking catastrophe because the small fire could have spread, and criminal mischief.
Thompson is in the county jail in lieu of $50,000 bond pending a preliminary hearing slated for Wednesday before District Judge Suzanne R. Blaschak.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.