Springdale cop accused in sex scandal to resign
An “agreement in principle” has been reached for a suspended Springdale police officer to resign, borough Council President David Finley said Wednesday.
Officer David E. Walton has been on suspension since accusations were made that he was having sex with a woman in an unmarked borough police car while on duty last week.
The borough held a closed hearing on Walton's suspension on Monday.
“My understanding is he's resigned,” Finley said. “There's an agreement in principle.”
Phone numbers for Walton that operated within the past week have been disconnected. He and his wife have previously declined to comment.
Council has not yet accepted a resignation, and Walton remains suspended, Finley said. He said council may schedule a special meeting to act on the issue. Council's next regular meeting is Nov. 19.
Finley said Walton will be paid for unused vacation and sick days, but not as part of any agreement.
“It's not in exchange. We owe it to him. He's earned that,” Finley said. “You can't take away something somebody's earned.”
The borough's labor attorney, Craig Alexander, did not return calls for comment Wednesday.
Mayor Eileen Miller, who heads the police department, could not be reached for comment.
Finley said Walton was being represented by the Fraternal Order of Police. An FOP representative could not be reached for comment.
According to Springdale officials, several juveniles said they saw Walton with a woman in an unmarked police car on Sherosky Way off Butler Street near the Allegheny River. They said Walton was the only officer on duty at the time.
The allegations against Walton are the latest regarding the police department.
The borough's insurance carrier recently paid $225,000 to settle a federal lawsuit involving alleged civil rights violations against a man by former borough police Sgt. Mark E. Thom and other officers.
Thom pleaded guilty in March to a federal charge of depriving the man of his civil rights. Thom is scheduled to be sentenced in January in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh.
Another former officer, Jeremy Liotta, was charged with possession of drugs and stealing his own police badge after a traffic stop in May in Harmar. He was no longer a borough officer at that time.
His preliminary hearing on the charges, which has been delayed, is now scheduled for 9 a.m. Oct. 30 before Plum Judge Linda Zucco, according to court records.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.