Trial awaits Winfield man accused of using fake bomb in robbery attempt
A 27-year-old Winfield man was ordered Wednesday to stand trial for allegedly showing a fake bomb in an attempt to rob a Buffalo Township pharmacy.
Police say Kenneth K. Miller, of Clearfield Road confessed to attempting to rob the Colonial Pharmacy, along Ekastown Road, Buffalo Township on Oct. 28 in order to get painkillers for his sick brother.
A masked man walked into just after 8 p.m., pharmacy owner Ethan Schwartz said in a phone interview Wednesday.
The robber set a box with wires attached on the counter and demanded painkillers.
“He told me he needed painkillers for a sick relative, and I told him it was locked up,” Schwartz said.
The robber left empty-handed, but police found Miller in a nearby business' parking lot, police said.
He was wearing the same camouflage pants and dark hooded sweatshirt described by Schwartz.
In an affidavit, police said they found a fake bomb — a white box with wires attached — inside a black bag in Miller's truck. The box contained only soap, according to police. They said they also found a gun, but it wasn't seen during the robbery.
Police said Miller admitted to the robbery attempt to “get pain medication for his brother, who had cancer.”
Miller's wife said the family declined to comment on advice of her husband's attorney.
His attorney, Robert Spohn, said that Miller's claim is true.
Miller waived to court robbery and other charges before District Judge Sue Haggerty in Saxonburg. He's also charged with having a weapon of mass destruction, bomb threats, terroristic threats and reckless endangerment.
He was arraigned and sent to the Butler County jail in lieu of $100,000 bail. Miller is slated to have a court arraignment in Butler on Dec. 31.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.