Vandergrift man accused of trading stepfather's guns for drugs
A Vandergrift man faces multiple felony charges after allegedly trading his stepfather's guns for drugs in Pittsburgh.
Jared Johnson, 24, was charged on Saturday with two felony counts of stolen weapons, carrying a firearm without a permit and transferring a weapon without a permit. The charges were filed at District Judge James Andring's office and, as of Sunday evening, were not yet processed by the court, according to state police Trooper John Corna of the Kittanning barracks.
Johnson apparently stole his stepfather's .380-caliber handgun and 20-gauge shotgun in September from their shared Crawford Avenue home.
He couldn't provide police with exact dates when he confessed to the crime on Oct. 28, Corna said.
Drug-related charges have not been filed in the case. Corna was unaware of the quantity or type of drugs for which he traded the guns.
The guns' serial numbers have been registered as stolen, Corna said, though they'll unlikely be recovered.
“Unfortunately, it's nearly impossible to trace stolen guns in these types of situations,” he said.
Johnson's stepfather told police the guns were worth about $600.
The preliminary hearing has not yet been scheduled.
Corna said Johnson's potential sentencing will vary, based on his criminal record, and could carry up to 23 months in county jail.
Johnson was found guilty in 2009 of marijuana possession. A felony charge of possession with intent to distribute marijuana was withdrawn from Westmoreland County court.
He has also plead guilty to three traffic summaries from 2010 to 2011.
Braden Ashe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4673 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.