Suspect eludes Freeport police by jumping into Buffalo Creek
Freeport Police with the help of the Freeport Fire Department search under the new Laneville Bridge for a man who eluded capture on Monday, Dec. 2, 2013.
Photo by WPXI
Searchers were in Buffalo Creek on Monday morning looking for a man who jumped into the creek to get away from police in Freeport.
The water search was called off when a police dog from the Armstrong County District Attorney's Office found footprints coming out of the creek, Freeport police Chief Jeff Swiklinski said.
Swiklinski said an officer encountered the suspect shortly after 3:30 a.m. at a boat launch on the creek. The officer was following up on a call about a half-hour earlier in regard to a suspicious person knocking on windows at the senior citizen high-rise on Riverside Drive.
Swiklinski said the officer tried to talk with the man and get his identification, but said the man was hostile and uncooperative.
The man kept backing toward the boat launch saying, “I'm not going back to jail,” and ran into the water.
The officer followed the man along the shore as far as he could before losing sight of him, Swiklinski said.
The man was not seen again.
Firefighters with the Freeport Volunteer Fire Department and Citizens Hose, from Harrison, searched the creek. Lower Kiski Emergency Services assisted with sonar.
Based on the footprints that were found, Swiklinski said they believe the man got out of the water, but that is not known for sure.
Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4701 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.