East Vandergrift sewage project bids miss mark
East Vandergrift hopes to have better luck on Monday when a second round of bids are opened for the borough's $5 million stormwater/sewage separation project.
A new round of bids was called for when, according to borough officials, the four lowest bidders didn't meet all the proposal's requirements. Among those requirements are that a contractor doesn't employ undocumented foreign workers and that residents of low-income areas have an opportunity to work for the contractor.
The fifth-ranked bidder, A. Merante Construction of West Mifflin, submitted a $5.148 million proposal. That's $148,000 over what the borough has to spend on the project, which affects 325 borough property owners.
Solicitor Charles Fox III said all rights of way have been signed and condemnations have been filed against property owners who haven't conveyed a right of way for the project.
Council has scheduled a special meeting for Dec. 16 to award a contract and give final approval for next year's budget.
In other business
• Council meetings for next year will remain the first Monday of the month, with the exception of the September meeting, which will be held on Sept. 2.
• Council awarded a $26,800 contract to Vandergrift to provide police service for next year. It's the same price East Vandergrift paid this year.
• A three-year trash hauling contract was approved with Copney Disposal of Apollo for $138,000.
Rates will remain at about $10 a month per household.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.