Freeport write-in winners prepare to take office
Two Freeport men with nine write-in votes between them are set to be sworn in as the newest Freeport Borough council members.
Sean McCalmont and Rich “Ricki” Hastings filed the paperwork necessary to be declared winners by the Armstrong County Election Bureau.
Neither campaigned for the office.
“I attend the meetings, and a couple people know I do that,” said Hastings, 32. “I was excited, I was glad to have it happen. I'm glad to serve the community in this way.”
Hastings is a salon manager for Philip Pelusi Salons and has lived in Freeport for about three years. He has not served in elective office before.
McCalmont, 48, said he had been considering running for Freeport mayor until he learned that Mayor James Swartz Jr. was running for re-election.
“Then people said I should run for council, but I had a bad experience and wasn't sure I wanted to get back into politics,” he said.
McCalmont previously lived in Springdale, where he served on council for about three years. He resigned from the post in May 2009 when an Allegheny County judge removed his name from the primary ballot. Although McCalmont owned two homes in Springdale, the judge ruled McCalmont's primary residence was in Freeport.
“I let the good Lord figure it all out for me,” McCalmont said. “I believe we're called to serve, and this is an opportunity to serve my community.”
Freeport was among seven municipalities in the Alle-Kiski Valley portion of Armstrong County that had fewer candidates than open council or supervisor positions.
Freeport Councilmen Don Rehner and Tim Adams were re-elected in November.
All four will be sworn in on Jan. 6.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.