Greensburg man charged with robbing Family Dollar in Apollo
A Greensburg man accused of suggestively holding one of his hands inside a coat pocket as he robbed an Apollo store on Sunday called police two days later to confess, state police say.
Scott Kevin Oberdorf, 43, of Harvey Avenue, Greensburg was in the Armstrong County Jail on Wednesday in lieu of $20,000 bail awaiting a preliminary hearing. Police say the suspect is the same man who threatened to blow up the Leechburg Bridge last year.
About 8 p.m. Sunday, Oberdorf allegedly stole about $100 from the Family Dollar store in North Plaza.
Oberdorf held his hand in his coat and demanded that the clerk “give me the money,” but the clerk thought he was kidding and told him so, police said. Oberdorf repeated his demand and shoved a counter display at the clerk before receiving money, police said.
Just before 3 p.m. Tuesday, Oberdorf allegedly called state police in Kittanning to say he wanted to surrender. A trooper went to an Apollo hotel, where Oberdorf was arrested. Oberdorf is charged with robbery, theft and harassment.A preliminary hearing is scheduled for 1 p.m. Dec. 26.
Oberdorf pleaded guilty to making a phone call threatening to blow up the Leechburg Bridge on Dec. 12, 2012.
Police said Oberdorf checked himself into a hospital for a psychological evaluation soon after and was arrested when he was released. He served several months in a county jail.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.