Neighbor accused of robbery attempt in Arnold
An Arnold man is accused of attempting to burglarize a neighbor's home early Sunday and knocking down a woman as he tried to flee police through the house.
Benjamin R. Spiering, 23, of the 1800 block of Fourth Avenue, Arnold, was arrested just after 4 a.m. two doors away from his residence.
Police had just been called by the middle-aged homeowner, who said an unknown man was trying to get inside the house.
The homeowner told police the man was at the back door. While a New Kensington officer watched the front door, according to a report, Arnold officers approached the rear door in time to see a man enter the house and close the door.
Police said Spiering was met at the door by the homeowner. Spiering rushed by the man and ran into the living room, where he collided with the homeowner's wife and knocked her down, police said.
Arnold police Chief Willie Weber entered to find the woman getting up from the floor. New Kensington Officer Matthew Saxon was ordering Spiering to get down.
Police charged Spiering with assault, burglary, defiant trespass and loitering and prowling at night.
Spiering was in the Westmoreland County jail on Monday in lieu of $25,000 bond pending a preliminary hearing scheduled for Jan. 2 in New Kensington.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.