Share This Page

Felsing fills open seat on Saxonburg council

| Sunday, Jan. 12, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
Submitted
Saxonburg Councilman David Felsing

For the second time since he was elected in 2007, Saxonburg Councilman David Felsing has been appointed to a vacancy on the board after losing in the general election.

Felsing, 59, was appointed to a two-year council term on Jan. 6.

The seat opened when Pam Bauman resigned to become Saxonburg's mayor.

Council president Carol Neubert said they chose Felsing because of his experience.

“He has been on council. David has a wonderful memory; he remembers what goes on,” she said. Two others submitted letters of interest for the position, she said.

“We were impressed with both of them, but David won because he had the experience,” Neubert said.

Felsing lost his first re-election bid in 2011. That year, Felsing and Bauman ran for a two-year seat and a four-year seat. She won both and chose the four-year term.

Council appointed Felsing to the two-year term.

In the November election, Felsing came in fifth among four people running for four seats on council.

“I just chalked it up to the fact that it's a predominantly Republican town,” he said. “All the Republicans got their names on (the ballot) first. I was the last one on the list.”

He is one of two Democrats on council. The other is Vice President Patricia Rinebolt.

Felsing said he applied to fill the vacant seat because he wanted to continue his work on council.

“I feel there are things I was involved in that are started but not finished, like (improving) the second half of Main Street and trying to get more business to come into town,” he said. “I don't like leaving things unfinished.”

Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or jweigand@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.