Vandergrift man hospitalized after throat slashing
A Vandergrift man who suffered knife wounds early Thursday was in fair condition, officials said.
Dane E. Hawley, 41, of 513-A Lowell St., was being treated in Forbes Regional Hospital, Monroeville, for a wound in the left side of his neck and possibly other wounds, police Chief Joe Caporali said.
The incident was reported at Hawley's residence at about 6:30 a.m.
Hawley's 10-year-old son and 14-year-old daughter were in the residence.
“The boy got his sister when they heard arguing. They came downstairs to see blood everywhere,” Caporali said.
According to a police report, when Vandergrift and other police arrived, Hawley and his girlfriend, Erin Baldwin, 40, of Vandergrift, were on the porch.
A bloody knife was on the floor between them, and police seized the knife, the report said.
According to the report, Hawley may have been wounded elsewhere because police officers found blood throughout the residence and on an interior stairwell.
The “holder” for the knife was found in a second-floor bedroom of the residence.
Caporali described the knife as an 8-inch doubled-edged dagger with skulls on the handle.
Baldwin was taken to Allegheny Valley Hospital, Harrison, for cuts on her hands. She hasn't been charged.
Police and Westmoreland County detectives are investigating.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.