2 adults, 2 teens arrested in Arnold robbery attempt
Two adults and two juveniles are accused of trying to rob pedestrians at gunpoint in Arnold on Wednesday night.
Rebecca Lynn Duncan, 20, of the 1900 block of Alcoa Drive, Arnold; Gregory Jamal Jackson, 18, of the 1400 block of Orchard Avenue, Arnold; and two boys, ages 15 and 16, have been charged.
According to police, a man and woman said they were walking along 16th Street near Third Avenue about 9 p.m. when a white Pontiac G6 pulled over near them. The victims told police that one of the people in the car asked them if they had any money.
When they said no, the victims said, one person got out of the car's back seat and pointed what appeared to be a rifle at the victims, then got back into the car, which drove away.
The victims told police they called a friend, who picked them up, and were able to remember the Pontiac's license plate number.
Police said the car was registered to Duncan and another woman, and officers were able to stop it in the 800 block of Barnes Street.
According to police, a search of the vehicle yielded an air rifle, two air pistols and a large knife.
Duncan and Jackson are charged with attempted robbery, terroristic threats, reckless endangerment, having instruments of crime and corruption of minors.
The two boys are in the custody of juvenile authorities and are facing delinquency charges.
Duncan and Jackson were arraigned Thursday in New Kensington by District Judge Frank J. Pallone Jr.
He ordered them sent to the Westmoreland County jail in lieu of $25,000 bail each.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Jan. 23.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.