Share This Page

Beaver County man allegedly held girlfriend, baby captive

| Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

A Beaver County man will stand trial for allegedly holding his girlfriend and her baby captive in their Springdale Township residence.

Richard Joseph Heinold Jr., 24, of 306 Tank Farm Road, Independence Township near Aliquippa, was returned to the Allegheny County jail in lieu of $500,000 bond pending trial after his preliminary hearing Monday.

Heinold is charged with unlawful restraint, simple assault, false imprisonment, terroristic threats and harassment.

Kadie Snyder, 20, of Spring Street, Springdale Township, testified that she met Heinold on a computer dating site in December.

“We talked night and day for about a month before he moved in with me the end of January,” she testified.

“He moved in with me because we were boyfriend-girlfriend,” Snyder testified. “His parents brought him. He brought food. That was great because there wasn't any food in the house,” she testified.

“Everything was OK for the first couple of days. Then everything changed,” Snyder said.

It was about Jan. 28, said Snyder, when Heinold took her cellphone, deleted all contacts and photos, and wouldn't allow her to freely talk to anyone — even when her parents visited.

Snyder testified Heinold wouldn't allow her to eat for four days so she could take part in fasting, a concept she said she knows nothing about, and he only allowed her 15-month-old son to eat once a day.

Snyder said she was terrified because Heinold threatened to “knock the walls down” on them if she talked to anyone.Snyder was the only witness at Heinold's preliminary hearing. He entered a not guilty plea and remained silent throughout the hearing.

Asked if Heinold was in the courtroom, Snyder physically shook as she pointed to a handcuffed and shackled Heinold who was sitting in Cheswick District Judge David Sosovicka's courtroom.

“He said I was possessed by Satan and he whacked me. He'd cracked me in my face with a slipper often and he hit me in my eye,” Snyder testified, pointing to her left eye.

Snyder testified that Heinold ranted at her while quoting Bible verses and he often talked about Bible prophecy. “He kept calling me ‘Satan's whore' and ‘the whore who cried wolf,' ” she testified.

Snyder said Heinold also abused her baby.

“He hit my son with pieces of a wicker basket on his legs and butt,” she testified.

Snyder testified Heinold wouldn't allow her to go out, not even to get baby food.

Snyder testified that he limited how often she could hold the baby and wouldn't allow the child to sleep in bed with her.

When Heinold left the house on Jan. 30, Snyder called her father, who immediately called police.

On Jan. 31 at night court, District Judge James A. Motznik ordered Heinold held in lieu of $500,000 bond, court records show.

Public defender Keith E. Donnelly argued Monday that the alleged injuries were minor and that Snyder didn't need medical treatment. He doubted that she was held captive.

“Why not say something when her parents visited?” he asked.Donnelly called the half-million dollar bond “quite absurd” and asked Sosovicka to reduce it.“The Stockholm Syndrome explains it. She was terrified. It was a mind control thing,” countered Assistant District Attorney Robert J. Heister Jr., arguing against a bond reduction.Sosovicka held all charges to court and kept the bond at $500,000 pending trial.

Donnelly said a bond reduction hearing will be requested at county court.

Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or cbiedka@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.