East Deer man Webster to go on trial for molesting boy, girl
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Thursday, Feb. 13, 2014, 12:36 a.m.
A 41-year-old East Deer man was ordered Wednesday to stand trial for allegedly sexually abusing a girl and boy in 2005.
Robert William Webster Jr. pleaded not guilty during his preliminary hearing Wednesday.
The sole witness said Webster forced him to have sex with a sleeping girl. The witness testified Webster then forced him to have sex with Webster.
The witness said Webster performed a lewd act in front of him on more than one occasion and that he was forced to watch pornography with Webster.
The boy said he told police about the abuse last month after he received counseling.
A public defender did not ask the witness any questions.
Allegheny County Police filed charges on Jan. 23. Webster has been in the county jail since Jan. 24 in lieu of $100,000 cash bond.
Webster is charged with rape, indecent assault, endangering the welfare of children, statutory sexual assault, sexual exploitation of children, showing porn to a minor, and six related charges. Brackenridge District Judge Carolyn Bengel ordered all 12 charges held to court.
The case was sent to Allegheny County Court for trial in May.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cool chemistry: Programs at Springdale library take inspiration from late science professor
- Battle of Fort Hand 235th anniversary to open window into frontier life
- 1 remains in hospital after knife fight in New Kensington apartment
- Tax law proves its worth by bringing in lost revenue
- Winfield Road bridge replacement to begin in 2015
- Instagram builds Oakmont barber’s rep for innovative cuts, ‘hair tattooing’
- New Kensington police find stolen handgun, detain 2 juveniles
- Peregrine falcons hang around Tarentum Bridge
- Arnold teen back home, but some A-K Valley missing-person cases decades old
- Oakmont council OKs Speedway project
- Lower Burrell restaurant’s noise subject of Liquor Control Board hearing