Cheswick man arraigned in death of Etna woman
A Cheswick man was arraigned on Tuesday on charges that he allegedly caused the death of an Etna woman a year ago in a crash on Route 28.
Jared P. Schillinger, 29, is accused of vehicular homicide while driving drunk in the Feb. 16, 2013 death of Rikki Fleming, 18, of Etna.
Police say Schillinger was driving drunk when he drove into the back of Fleming's car near the Highland Park Bridge. Fleming's car was pushed up an embankment and it overturned.
Schillinger is also charged with involuntary manslaughter, two counts of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, speeding, reckless driving and careless driving.
Schillinger was arraigned by Allegheny County night court staff on Tuesday afternoon instead of District Judge Elissa M. Lang in Sharpsburg as initially planned, state police said.
Allegheny County Sheriff William P. Mullen confirmed that Schillinger surrendered to deputies at the municipal court building in Pittsburgh and was formally charged there.
His bond was set at $75,000 unsecured, pending a preliminary hearing tentatively scheduled for Feb. 28 in Pittsburgh.
Schillinger's attorney was not available for comment.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.