Share This Page

Maintenance man accused in thefts

| Saturday, Feb. 22, 2014, 1:11 a.m.

A 43-year-old public housing maintenance man is accused of using his job to take money and pain pills from residents at Dalton's Edge at Tarentum.

Jorge L. Gonzalez, of 192 Park Ave., Harrison, is charged with theft, burglary and trespassing.

The charges were filed on Feb. 13 by the Allegheny County Public Housing Authority, which owns and operates the Dalton's Edge complex in Tarentum and Brackenridge.

Housing authority police allege Gonzalez used a master key to get inside apartments when the residents weren't there. Police suspected that because the burglaries didn't involve forced entry. According to an affidavit, Gonzalez allegedly entered four or five apartments at least five times — sometimes for a legitimate purpose — when he took money.

Police allege that he took about $400 in cash and OxyContin narcotic pain pills from one resident while she was in a hospital and about $80 in quarters from another resident who later confronted the man.

According to police, Gonzalez paid back the $80 in increments.

He didn't give back the pills or $400 that police believe he took about Jan. 17.

Gonzalez was sent to the Allegheny County Jail in lieu of $20,000 bond pending a March 5 preliminary hearing by Brackenridge District Judge Carolyn Bengel.

Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.