Share This Page

Hays eagle fends off raccoon attack

| Thursday, Feb. 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m.

A raccoon attacked the bald eagle nest in Hays early late Wednesday night.

The bird sitting on the eggs, presumably the female eagle, reared up and scared the predatory animal off.

All three eggs seem to be intact, according to Bill Powers, CEO and president of PixController of Murrysville, the company that installed the nest webcam with the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

Powers said the raccoon paid its unwelcome visit to the nest at about 11:15 p.m. Wednesday night.

“Raccoons are notorious for nest predation of different types of birds and animals,” said Brian Shema, director of conservation at the Audubon Society of Western Pennsylvania.

At first, the eagle seems surprised by the raccoon and takes a couple of seconds to react, Shema said.

The bird spread out its seven foot-wingspan and thrust its talons out toward the raccoon in a classic display of aggression.

The raccoon quickly turned tail and fled the nest.

Eagles use the attack posture to intimidate foes, according to Shema.

“Actually physical contact is rare but, when it occurs, it is fatal,” he said.

If the raccoon would have stayed in the nest, the eagle would have defended its eggs, possibly killing the raccoon.

Mary Ann Thomas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4691 or mthomas@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.