1 caught, 1 sought in severe beating in Natrona Heights
Harrison police charged a township man and are looking for another in the savage beating of a man Thursday night when he arrived at a busy gas station to talk with his ex-girlfriend.
Police say Jonathan Meigs, 23, of 106 Garfield St., Natrona and an unidentified man drove up in an SUV and chased the 23-year-old Harrison man into a BP gas station at 1717 Freeport Road in Natrona Heights about 9:20 p.m.
The man was assaulted inside and outside the store and received life-threatening injuries, police said. He was in a Pittsburgh hospital on Friday in critical condition.
Police said Meigs and the other man used bats or something similar to repeatedly hit the alleged victim on the back of the head. The ex-girlfriend is a clerk at the store.
Meigs, who is charged with aggravated assault, reckless endangering, stalking, and having an instrument of crime, was arraigned in Pittsburgh on Friday. Bail was set at $25,000.
From surveillance cameras and witnesses statements, police learned the attackers left in a silver Chevrolet Equinox whose license plate was traced.
The SUV is registered to Meigs' friend, Miranda Mullen, 22, also of 106 Garfield St.
Police said she insisted she was driving the Equinox in Murrysville at 9:30 p.m. even though surveillance footage shows it was at the BP at the time of the beating.
As a result, police are charging Mullen with hindering apprehension or prosecution and making false reports to police. She was to be arraigned in night court later Friday.
Allegheny County police technicians were checking the SUV for evidence.
Officers are looking for the second man, who is shown in store surveillance images wearing dark-colored clothing and a hooded jacket. No other description was made public.
Preliminary hearings are scheduled for March 12 for Meigs and Mullen.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.