Tarentum woman sentenced to 3 years for writing bad checks
A former Tarentum woman has been sentenced to three years in federal prison on her second bank fraud conviction in the last 10 years, the U.S. Attorney's Office announced on Tuesday.
According to federal prosecutors, Suzanne Czwalga Andre, 48, formerly of Allegheny Street, Tarentum wrote $21,000 in bad checks at various branches of Citizens Bank from July to November 2011.
Federal authorities say she committed the crimes while on supervised release after a nearly six-year sentence on a bank fraud charge stemming from her purchase of a Fox Chapel home with an ill-gotten cashier's check worth nearly $400,000.
As a result, she will be sent to state prison for more than five years.
According to court documents, Andre wrote nine bad checks totaling more than $21,000 from a bank account in her mother's name and another that she opened in her and her mother's name.
Two of the checks, amounting to about $7,700, were written on an account in Andre's child's name.
Andre later admitted that she wrote the bad checks, according to court documents.
She said she often gained the trust of bank employees and car dealerships by telling them a lie that she was receiving a financial settlement for an accident that happened while she was in the Allegheny County Jail, according to court documents.
Andre is to spend the next five years in prison.
She will first serve a 27-month prison term for violating supervised release, which will be followed by her three-year sentence on the latest bank fraud charge. She will return to supervised release for five years.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4702 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.