New Ken water workers reject contract proposal from fact-finder
The more-than-five-year impasse between the New Kensington water authority board and its workers will continue because the union voted down a contract proposed by a neutral state fact-finder.
Ron C. Balla, president of the Utility Workers Union of American Local 220, which represents about 23 authority employees, said the union on Tuesday rejected the proposal offered by Thomas L. Hewitt, a fact-finder from the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board.
The five-member authority board unanimously approved the proposal on March 6, according to board Chairman Ron Zampogna.
“We weren't 100 percent pleased, but I guess nobody ever is,” Zampogna said. “We were hoping to get this settled, so we accepted it.”
The union continues to work under the terms of a contract that expired in November 2008.
Balla said the union took issue with some of the facts presented by the authority, which he believes led to skewed suggestions by Hewitt.
“We don't believe some of the evidence conveyed by the authority was completely factual,” Balla said.
He noted the fact-finder's report, issued March 3 and released to the public on Thursday, references a 2006 Valley News Dispatch investigation into the New Kensington authority's hiring practices and high wages and benefits compared to other authorities.
Balla said the union wasn't given a chance to rebut the inclusion of those stories because mention of them wasn't in the authority's preliminary report to the fact-finder. Balla said the union's national leadership wasn't given an opportunity to comment when the articles were printed.
Additionally, Balla said testimony given about bonuses for non-union managers wasn't accurate.
Balla said the union did appreciate some suggestions from the fact-finder that he believes are common sense improvements to work rules.
“At the end of the day, it's a nonbinding situation,” Balla said of fact-finding. “It was easy to enter into it to shake the tree a little bit. It wasn't everything I thought it was going to be. We can use a lot of it as a guideline at our next session.”
Zampogna said the authority board wasn't satisfied with all of the suggestions, but felt it was a fair compromise.
He said the board didn't like the suggestion of giving employees 20 hours of vacation pay in addition to their annual vacation time off.
But the board felt it was an improvement over the current contract that offers employees 13 weeks of vacation pay, minus actual vacation time used, once every five years.
“That went away for the steel mills in the 1970s,” he said. “We definitely were asking for some givebacks on things we thought, for 2014, were not in line with the times.”
Zampogna said the board had been asking for employees to pay 10 percent of their health insurance premiums, up from 5 percent. The fact-finder suggested 8 percent contributions.
Zampogna said the board could live with the suggested 2.5 percent annual raises, which is more than the 1.75 percent the board offered.
“We felt even though there was some things we didn't agree with, we were willing to accept it to have the union have a contract,” he said. “The board's a little disappointed that this isn't over.”
Zampogna said no negotiation sessions have been scheduled. Since a state mediator attends all bargaining meetings, Zampogna said it can take time to arrange the schedules of everyone involved.
“We believe we are somewhat closer in negotiating,” Balla said. “But we feel strongly that we will continue to fight for a fair agreement based on facts and evidence that support our position.”
Liz Hayes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-226-4680 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tarentum man wants confiscated cash back so he can hire attorney
- Cambodian students answer Oakmont group’s prayers
- Leechburg Area School District contracts with Pittsburgh firm for online database
- Waterline break closes Apollo-Ridge schools
- Lower Burrell sewer projects will cost millions
- Leechburg lands $11M package for sewer separation project
- New Kensington man charged with molesting girl, 12
- Highlands to reassess bus contract
- Hosannas for nonprofit helping to fix Tarentum man’s house
- Pair of Cheswick Council members skip meetings, but not monthly checks
- Knights of Columbus to auction New Kensington building