Share This Page

Rooftop burglars nabbed at former department store in Lower Burrell

| Wednesday, March 19, 2014, 1:30 p.m.
Submitted
Kevin Foster of Beltzhoover was accused of burglary after police found him and another man on the roof of the former J. C. Penney store in Burrell Plaza in Lower Burrell on Tuesday, March 18, 2014.
Submitted
Jonathan Lachman of Greensburg was accused of burglary after police found him and another man on the roof of the former J. C. Penney store in Burrell Plaza in Lower Burrell on Tuesday, March 18, 2014.S

A vacant store in Lower Burrell is attracting unwanted customers.

Alleged scrap thieves Kevin Mark Foster Jr., 23, of Pittsburgh's Beltzhoover neighborhood and Jonathan Edward Lachman, 24, of Greensburg were arrested on the roof of the J.C. Penney building in Burrell Plaza along Leechburg Road just before 2 a.m. Tuesday, city police said.

Foster and Lachman were in the Westmoreland County jail Wednesday in lieu of $75,000 cash bond each pending preliminary hearings.

Detective Sgt. Scott Cardenas said patrol officers saw a black Jeep Cherokee, thought to be used in several prior burglaries including one at J.C. Penney last Thursday, in a lot near the closed department store.

Police found burglary tools near the loading dock and began to search the building.

After hearing footsteps on the roof, police called Lower Burrell No. 3 firefighters to bring ladders.

Cardenas said he and Detective Sgt. Jason Napier went to the roof and arrested both men without incident.

The men are charged with burglary, trespassing, having instruments of crime, loitering and prowling at night and criminal mischief.

Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or cbiedka@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.