4 communities may share Prospect Cemetery upkeep
Whether four communities will agree to jointly maintain Prospect Cemetery should be known within a few weeks.
Representatives from Brackenridge, Tarentum, Harrison and Fawn met on Monday night in the Brackenridge Borough Building along with members of the cemetery's board of trustees. They discussed what might be done about the 150-year old cemetery in Brackenridge, which has come close to turning into an eyesore in recent years.
Frustrated by a lack of funds to maintain the cemetery, Curt Murtland, president of the Prospect Cemetery Association, said the six-member board is close to submitting resignations to the Allegheny County courts. That would leave the property without a custodian and could force Brackenridge to take on that role.
Freeport attorney Gerald DeAngelis, who is advising the cemetery trustees, outlined one development that could have an impact.
Although an archaic state law prevents a municipality from spending more than $30 per year on maintenance for an abandoned or neglected cemetery, DeAngelis said the state's borough code has a provision that allows for maintenance without such a limit. He said the second-class township code mirrors that.
“Once the organization dies, then nobody owns it,” DeAngelis said, adding that is when the borough code would kick in.
“So, it appears there is authority under the borough code and, I guess we have two townships here. too, to care for this cemetery on a joint basis,” said Craig Alexander, Brackenridge's solicitor.
Murtland, DeAngelis and other members of the cemetery board, emphasized that all four communities have a stake in the Prospect issue in that it is the resting place of more than 700 war veterans dating back to the War of 1812. DeAngelis pointed out many influential historical figures responsible for the rise of the four communities, not to mention relatives of residents in each community, are interred there.
“These people (trustees), in all good faith, don't want to let this property go to pot,” DeAngelis said.
The 17-acre tract is located in Brackenridge but near the line with Tarentum. It is 150 years old and contains the remains of 17,000 people, all of whom were members of the Prospect Cemetery Association, the owner of the property.
Murtland said the cemetery is about 98 percent full. He outlined the problems: few living members and few lots to sell, declining revenue from fewer burials and a perpetual care fund that was ravaged by the national financial crisis in 2008. The result, he said, is the association is virtually broke and cannot afford to cut the grass in the cemetery.
Dave Montanari, a Fawn supervisor, asked what Murtland was looking for in the way of help and what it cost to keep the cemetery maintained.
Murtland said up until last year, they were able to keep the grass cut at a cost of $15,000 a year but the former groundskeeper had to be let go because of the finances. He said new grass-cutting proposals would have to be sought.
John Stanzione, a Brackenridge councilman, said it appeared the logical step is for the communities to participate by providing equal shares of money or labor and equipment to maintain the cemetery.
“It wouldn't hurt us, all four of us, with money,” Harrison Supervisor Gary Lilly said. “We're not talking about that much money.”
Brackenridge Councilwoman Mary Lou Poli, who organized the meeting, asked the other municipal representatives to discuss the matter with the rest of their governing bodies and get back to her with a response on what they are willing to do.
Tom Yerace is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4675 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Leechburg bank robbed
- Home invasion reported in Tarentum
- Harrison woman burned in trailer fire
- PixController honored by Audubon Society for Hays eagle nest camera
- PennDOT response fails to satisfy New Kensington’s safety concerns about Route 366
- Saxonburg man pleads no contest to setting boy, 7, on fire
- Charges filed in June stabbing of Buffalo Township sailor
- EPA finds no contamination from Parks Township nuclear dump
- Tarentum fire hits vehicles, garage
- Gas prices are falling, but Pittsburgh area lags behind average
- Harrison considers options for Pittsburgh Heritage Trail through township