Freeport to spend $10K on sewage overflow problem
Freeport will spend $10,000 on a plan to resolve the borough's sewage overflow issue during heavy rains.
KLH Engineers will draw up plans based on recommendations from the state Department of Environmental Protection, which recently rejected the borough's original control plan, submitted in 2011.
The borough's storm water and sewage systems are combined. During extremely heavy rains, the treatment system is overwhelmed, borough council President Don Rehner said.
The state requires the borough to have an 85 percent capture rate, and the system can't achieve that during heavy rains, he said.
DEP has not suggested that the borough separate its storm water and sewage system, as it has mandated in other communities, Rehner said.
The system serves about 800 customers.
In other business
Council awarded a contract to Youngblood Paving of Wampum to pave Market Street between Fifth and Seventh streets. The company had the lowest of 10 submitted proposals at $27,332.
The solicitor will review the Youngblood bid and the two other lowest bids from Ron Gillette Inc. of Harrison ($34,518) and Derry Construction of Derry Township ($35,818) to ensure they comply with bid specifications.
Should there would be an issue with Youngblood's bid, the borough would have the option of moving to the second lowest bidder.
PennDOT estimated that the paving project could cost as much as $36,000.
Council sought bids in hopes of getting a lower price.
The borough has applied for a grant from Armstrong County that could yield up to $15,000 to mill and pave the badly deteriorated section.
The borough has $26,000 in its paving fund.
Jodi Weigand is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.