O'Hara Council green lights new $8.2 million community center
Boyd Community Center Executive Director Stephanie Flom couldn't contain her excitement Tuesday night after hearing O'Hara Council give the green light to a new $8.2 million facility.
“It's finally happening,” she said, raising her arms into the air. “People wanted to see something moving on this, and they're going to get it.”
Council voted unanimously to seek bids for construction on a new center that will replace the 31-year-old former school building along Powers Run Road that serves as the center's home.
Some residents previously questioned the move since organizers are short about $500,000 in the capital campaign.
But Flom said moving forward is crucial.
“The bid is so important as it will determine the actual cost of the project,” Flom said. “Donors want to help us fill any remaining gap to build this amazing building, and the bid will provide this essential information.”
Flom said the new site will be built to suit the needs of Lower Valley residents, with room for program growth. The base bid for the new facility will be 28,000 square feet.
Boyd offers more than 300 courses in cramped classrooms that often are subject to maintenance problems, Flom said.
“We are thrilled to proceed with this,” she said of the project that's been stalled five years in planning and fundraising.
Township Manager Julie Jakubec said council will seek bids on six contracts that include electrical, plumbing and general construction work.
Bids will be due by May 6.
The community center would be built on the existing 11-acre property, which houses the Boyd building.
If a contract is awarded in May, construction is expected to be completed by 2015.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.