Freeport Borough deals with sewage backup problem
Freeport Borough officials are hoping to solve a sewage backup problem before homes are affected.
The Riverside Drive pump station has backed up three times in the last month because of equipment failures.
The 30-year-old pump station needs new control equipment, though the pumps remain in good shape, according to officials.
It's becoming more difficult for the borough to get parts, prompting the borough to consider a $12,300 equipment overhaul.
HCS Co. of Portersville offered Freeport that price for equipment.
Officials, however, will seek another bid for a comparison before making a decision.The money will come from the sewage account or capital reserve fund.
The borough's other pump station, a new, $248,000 one installed as part of the Freeport Bridge project, will cost the borough $124,000.
Council is hoping to convert a federal grant of $103,000 earmarked for engineering of the pump station, to the borough's actual share of the pump station cost.
PennDOT paid the other $124,000 for the new pump station.
In other business
• The borough's clean-up day will be on Wednesday.
Council, however, reminded residents that Armstrong County will have a day set aside for hard-to-recycle items on May 17 at the Armstrong Recycling Center, 139 Armsdale Road, Kittanning.
Items accepted that day will include televisions, computers and monitors, cellphones, used tires, newspaper and cardboard.
For more information, Armstrong residents should log on to www.co.armstrong.pa.us or call 724-548-3223.
George Guido is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.