New Kensington police seek possible shooting witness
New Kensington police are looking for a possible witness to the wounding of a man in a car parked behind the Clarion Hotel at about 6 a.m. on April 8.
Police and Westmoreland County detectives on Tuesday said Charles Justin Stitt, 21, isn't a suspect. Stitt's last known address was in Apollo.
“He is a possible witness we need to talk with,” said county Det. John Clark. Police have deemed Stitt a “person on interest.”
The wounded man, whom police have identified only as a black man formerly of Vandergrift, has been released from Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh.
Police said he was shot once in his abdomen and once in an elbow. A small-caliber pistol was used.
The man was found inside a car behind the hotel at 300 Tarentum Bridge Road.
Earlier this month, police said they are looking for a blue Honda Accord that may have been driven by the shooting suspect. The car is described as a two-door model, probably dating from 2003 to 2008, that might have had tinted windows.
The car might have damage to its passenger door, and the driver's airbag might have deployed.
Chuck Biedka is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4711 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
More Valley News Dispatch
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.