Leechburg Area board ready to name superintendent
The Leechburg Area School Board is expected to name the district's new superintendent on Thursday.
District officials and board members confirmed on Tuesday that they've settled on a candidate but declined to identify who would take the top job until the hire is finalized.
“The board is not at liberty to discuss that at this time,” board member Anthony Shea said. “But I think the public will be pleased with who we've chosen to help move the district forward.”
Whoever the board appoints on Thursday will be the district's first permanent superintendent in nearly a year.
The district hired Frank Prazenica as interim superintendent in June when Jim Budzilek left to head the Mars Area School District. The board and Prazenica believed he'd serve the district for a brief transition period as they looked to hand over the reins to another permanent hire.
They thought that was done in November when they hired Terence Meehan from the New Castle Area School District, where he serves as assistant to the superintendent. He was expected to begin with Leechburg Area in late January but was delayed by the sudden death of a family member, which ultimately led him to back out in March and remain at New Castle Area.
The board has since been reviewing the previous dozen candidates and accepting new applications to fill the position, which Prazenica has maintained at a $400 per diem rate.
“(Prazenica) has been amazing for us,” said Carlotta Del Vecchio, board vice president. “Especially considering he didn't expect to be here as long as he has.”
Prazenica said he will remain with the district through the end of June.
The new superintendent is tentatively scheduled to begin July 1. Contract details were not yet available.
Braden Ashe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-226-4673 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.