Injuries reported in Allegheny Township head-on crash
Emergency personnel inspect one of the vehicles involved in a head on collision along Melwood Road near Markle Road in Allegheny Township on Tuesday, May 6, 2014.
Photo by Jason Bridge | Valley News Dispatch
Two people were injured in a head-on collision Tuesday afternoon on Melwood Road in Allegheny Township.
The wreck occurred about 3:30 p.m. about 400 feet past where Melwood Road forms a “Y” with Markle Road.
According to police, Charles Makara's Chevrolet Cobalt appeared to cross the center line and collided with Jennifer Shannon's Dodge Caravan.
Allegheny Township police Chief John Fontaine said Makara of New Kensington was flown by medical helicopter to a Pittsburgh hospital with what he called “serious injuries.”
Shannon of Vandergrift was taken by ambulance to a Forbes Regional Hospital in Monroeville, where she was in fair condition late Tuesday.
Makara had to be cut from his badly mangled car by first responders.
According to Markle Volunteer Fire Department Chief Jim Rearick, Shannon was able to remove herself from her minivan before collapsing on the side of the road.
Rearick said Shannon was complaining of wrist pain.
Fontaine said a cause of the accident has yet to be determined.
“We're still investigating,” he said. “We'll obviously make sure there were no issues with someone texting on their cellphone.
“There aren't any obvious skid marks to say if speed was an issue.”
Fontaine said police would try to interview both victims to determine a cause.
R.A. Monti is a freelance reporter for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.